10 on the issue of food additives

 10 on the issue of food additives
1, the National Standardization Committee on Food Additives organization look like?
A: National Standardization Committee on Food Additives, is hanging in the National Standardization Committee under the Organization for Standardization, is more than the national standard committee One of the Standards Committee, No. TC11. major review of the standards to do the work, including the standard review and approval. The Commission's secretariat is located in China CDC Nutrition and Food Safety, the members belonging to various departments, the Committee met only summoned.
2, the Committee reviewed the criteria for additive What?
A: risk assessment, based on risk assessment findings identified. evaluation of the additive is  assessment process, many things, from animal experiments, has been the exposure assessment, the purpose is to protect the health of the human body does not produce harm. useful and very important, additives, safety light, but no effect, not to promote Canada. new  additive standard  principle . The United Nations FAO and the World Health Organization Expert Committee set up JECFA, advocating risk assessment. Risk assessment is a large part of experiment. experiments at home and abroad are the same principles. First of all this material to verify the human body is not toxic. but poisonous concept is vague, what is toxic? so the virus is divided into many levels. and then see where the target organ toxicity. after a long-term animal experiments are done to see this material does not produce toxicity in animals What is the maximum dose. Finally,UGG shoes, according to the structure of the substance itself, and the difference between animal species itself, to give some safety factor, the principle is to drop too low as possible toxicity, the threshold is given ADI, or a daily per kilogram of body weight intake. This medicine toxicological experiments with similar, but there are differences. pharmaceutical research emphasis in the treatment process is allowed to have adverse reactions, but most emphasized that food security, because we want to use for life. < br> made the international threshold, generally follow the rest of the data. This is a huge amount of work to spend most of the developed countries are doing, developing countries have done very little since, at least up to now, China has not yet financially resources to do. Of course, we also do some animal experiments, but not well developed. When the international community has developed a particular state has the available additives, our main job is based on Chinese dietary patterns, the development an amount that can be used in our country, that is exposure assessment. we will allow the use of a food additive in the amount of accumulated inside all together and go see how much you eat, such as whether the value of more than ADI.
us Now do the most is exposure assessment. not that we do not do basic research, but Jibian we do, the result will not exceed the JECFA, people will only repeat the work. JECFA has done a lot of data, collected around the world results , the additives mentioned in the Code have done experimental study.
4, when China started to build from the list of food additives?
A: The earliest known department administrative regulations, 1950 issued by the Ministry of Health had sugar -coated use requirements. the first time there is a formal standard in 1981, is the earliest version of GB2760. modified several times in recent years, 2007 was one of the biggest changes.
5, the Chinese diet has its own characteristics , science you follow the standards of developed countries?
A: A material adverse reactions to the human body, at least three conditions: First, toxic to humans; second dose-response relationship, that should be generated only after a certain dose of this role; third is to have appropriate means, the appropriate target organ, for example, oral administration of toxic substances through the skin may not be toxic. America and Europe were mainly eat animal food, Chinese people eat more plant food. eat more certain strict restrictions on certain substances. threshold value for each kg of body weight per day, based on their access, so you eat this thing for life, all have the potential to play well, play to the maximum You also eat less than this amount , will never reach this threshold. In other words, it is safe. the existing science and technology can only achieve this level. Maybe a few years to achieve higher levels of biological assessment techniques, objected to the previous assessments, we will continue to adjust .
6, China's additives you use the standard conservative?
A: Our standard is indeed very conservative, and often abroad than the amount used to low. in the amount of benzoyl peroxide, and China is 60 units, 150 in Canada, the United States is not limited. We follow the principle that although the additive is safe, but it is only to satisfy our a choice of food. Meanwhile, we also provide the desired effect in the case, to as little as possible the use of additives.
7. Food additives are not used how?
A: It is the color, flavor and the pursuit of beauty. dinner When no one was willing to taste food. If the preservative canceled, how many things can be stored on the shelf? soy sauce, not a take-home has mildew. steamed buns have to add additives,UGG boots cheap, the fermentation will produce acid,UGG boots clearance, then add baking soda to neutralize acidity, which is additive. no additives, instant noodles , biscuits on the shelves is certainly not out; If not add pigment, and that the products on the market is bleak, candy certainly is not the current color. To tell a joke, if not additive, we may return to primitive life. < br> must be noted that, Sudan, melamine, etc., are not additive. food goes wrong, say that they are additive thing, the media and The role of positive publicity no additives, additives have been in the , there is a specification standard, that is additive own quality standards. such as benzoic acid, itself specifications for food. detection methods are also standard. but a lot of additives do not need testing. such as starch, thickeners, etc., is component of food, and food mixed together, their non-toxic. We put a major force on the  or detection difficult. such as spices, use and small, around the world have not developed detection methods for spices, because it is a mixture of many ingredients, plus a small amount, but will damage adds a flavor, so I do not need to detect.
9, additives which can easily arise in the course of the problem?
A: The additive itself is not wrong, some people indiscriminately. Some of the food production chain is very dirty, so more preservatives in foods. Melamine itself is not wrong, it is a very good building materials, is the number of lawless elements in making profits, the melamine added to the things which should not be added.
national standard conditions of use of additives and the use of regulations. if not the use of additives cover defects of the food itself, but this is only a requirement, not every company can do. to vegetables, for example, in the normal processing, as long as after autoclaving, its color will fade and become dull; but people vegetable color, flavor and the pursuit of beauty, hope vegetables, colors look better, so the standard allows adding pigment in it, it would have lost a bit of color make it up, this is a legitimate way. but some people took the food has been broken by In this way it looks fresh, and this violation was. This involves two questions: First, food production enterprises GMP certification or a good manufacturing practice, and second, the credibility of food production enterprises.
10, on additives, the sound development of the market have any suggestions?
A: According to the principles of risk assessment, the use of advanced technology, and constantly enrich and perfect the national standard. to provide a rich food for the people and prolonging product shelf life,cheap UGG boots, more important is to ensure that all consumer safety. is the only reference to national standards, we must allow all companies understand the enterprise is primarily responsible for food safety. The Government has regulatory responsibility, the people there are regulatory obligations.